changeset 27014:992a4596ce5d

[trivial] Fix typos in comments
author practicalswift <practicalswift@users.noreply.github.com>
date Tue, 21 Mar 2017 19:49:08 +0100
parents edf778d02a22
children 247134ec551c
files src/base58.cpp src/bench/bench.h src/blockencodings.cpp src/qt/guiutil.cpp src/qt/test/paymentservertests.cpp src/test/addrman_tests.cpp src/test/checkqueue_tests.cpp src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp src/test/merkle_tests.cpp src/test/rpc_tests.cpp src/test/util_tests.cpp src/validation.cpp
diffstat 12 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/base58.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/base58.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
         vchRet.clear();
         return false;
     }
-    // re-calculate the checksum, insure it matches the included 4-byte checksum
+    // re-calculate the checksum, ensure it matches the included 4-byte checksum
     uint256 hash = Hash(vchRet.begin(), vchRet.end() - 4);
     if (memcmp(&hash, &vchRet.end()[-4], 4) != 0) {
         vchRet.clear();
--- a/src/bench/bench.h	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/bench/bench.h	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 
 // Simple micro-benchmarking framework; API mostly matches a subset of the Google Benchmark
 // framework (see https://github.com/google/benchmark)
-// Wny not use the Google Benchmark framework? Because adding Yet Another Dependency
+// Why not use the Google Benchmark framework? Because adding Yet Another Dependency
 // (that uses cmake as its build system and has lots of features we don't need) isn't
 // worth it.
 
--- a/src/blockencodings.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/blockencodings.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
                 // request it.
                 // This should be rare enough that the extra bandwidth doesn't matter,
                 // but eating a round-trip due to FillBlock failure would be annoying
-                // Note that we dont want duplication between extra_txn and mempool to
+                // Note that we don't want duplication between extra_txn and mempool to
                 // trigger this case, so we compare witness hashes first
                 if (txn_available[idit->second] &&
                         txn_available[idit->second]->GetWitnessHash() != extra_txn[i].second->GetWitnessHash()) {
--- a/src/qt/guiutil.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/qt/guiutil.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@
             /* 10.10 or later system */
             if (language == "zh_CN" || language == "zh_TW" || language == "zh_HK") // traditional or simplified Chinese
               QFont::insertSubstitution(".Helvetica Neue DeskInterface", "Heiti SC");
-            else if (language == "ja") // Japanesee
+            else if (language == "ja") // Japanese
               QFont::insertSubstitution(".Helvetica Neue DeskInterface", "Songti SC");
             else
               QFont::insertSubstitution(".Helvetica Neue DeskInterface", "Lucida Grande");
--- a/src/qt/test/paymentservertests.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/qt/test/paymentservertests.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
     byteArray = QByteArray((const char*)&data[0], data.size());
     r.paymentRequest.parse(byteArray);
     // Ensure the request is initialized, because network "main" is default, even for
-    // uninizialized payment requests and that will fail our test here.
+    // uninitialized payment requests and that will fail our test here.
     QVERIFY(r.paymentRequest.IsInitialized());
     QCOMPARE(PaymentServer::verifyNetwork(r.paymentRequest.getDetails()), false);
 
--- a/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/test/addrman_tests.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@
     size_t percent23 = (addrman.size() * 23) / 100;
     BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == percent23);
     BOOST_CHECK(vAddr.size() == 461);
-    // (Addrman.size() < number of addresses added) due to address collisons.
+    // (Addrman.size() < number of addresses added) due to address collisions.
     BOOST_CHECK(addrman.size() == 2007);
 }
 
--- a/src/test/checkqueue_tests.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/test/checkqueue_tests.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
 }
 
 
-// Test that blocks which might allocate lots of memory free their memory agressively.
+// Test that blocks which might allocate lots of memory free their memory aggressively.
 //
 // This test attempts to catch a pathological case where by lazily freeing
 // checks might mean leaving a check un-swapped out, and decreasing by 1 each
--- a/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@
         // Loose Check that hit rate is above min_hit_rate
         BOOST_CHECK(hit > min_hit_rate);
         // Tighter check, count number of times we are less than tight_hit_rate
-        // (and implicityly, greater than min_hit_rate)
+        // (and implicitly, greater than min_hit_rate)
         out_of_tight_tolerance += hit < tight_hit_rate;
     }
     // Check that being out of tolerance happens less than
--- a/src/test/merkle_tests.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/test/merkle_tests.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
             // If no mutation was done (once for every ntx value), try up to 16 branches.
             if (mutate == 0) {
                 for (int loop = 0; loop < std::min(ntx, 16); loop++) {
-                    // If ntx <= 16, try all branches. Otherise, try 16 random ones.
+                    // If ntx <= 16, try all branches. Otherwise, try 16 random ones.
                     int mtx = loop;
                     if (ntx > 16) {
                         mtx = insecure_rand() % ntx;
--- a/src/test/rpc_tests.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/test/rpc_tests.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
     BOOST_CHECK(banned_until.get_int64() > now);
     BOOST_CHECK(banned_until.get_int64()-now <= 200);
 
-    // must throw an exception because 127.0.0.1 is in already banned suubnet range
+    // must throw an exception because 127.0.0.1 is in already banned subnet range
     BOOST_CHECK_THROW(r = CallRPC(std::string("setban 127.0.0.1 add")), std::runtime_error);
 
     BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW(CallRPC(std::string("setban 127.0.0.0/24 remove")));
--- a/src/test/util_tests.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/test/util_tests.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
     for (int mod=2;mod<11;mod++)
     {
         int mask = 1;
-        // Really rough binomal confidence approximation.
+        // Really rough binomial confidence approximation.
         int err = 30*10000./mod*sqrt((1./mod*(1-1./mod))/10000.);
         //mask is 2^ceil(log2(mod))-1
         while(mask<mod-1)mask=(mask<<1)+1;
--- a/src/validation.cpp	Mon Mar 20 17:58:40 2017 +0100
+++ b/src/validation.cpp	Tue Mar 21 19:49:08 2017 +0100
@@ -3152,7 +3152,7 @@
     bool fTooFarAhead = (pindex->nHeight > int(chainActive.Height() + MIN_BLOCKS_TO_KEEP));
 
     // TODO: Decouple this function from the block download logic by removing fRequested
-    // This requires some new chain datastructure to efficiently look up if a
+    // This requires some new chain data structure to efficiently look up if a
     // block is in a chain leading to a candidate for best tip, despite not
     // being such a candidate itself.